Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Gorshkov <gorshkovlists(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-10 01:58:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On 2011-02-03 22:48, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg Smith<greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>  wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> Yes they're useful, but like a plastic bad covering a broken car window,
>>> they're useful because they cover something that's inherently broken.
>> Awesome.  Now we have a car anology, with a funny typo no less.  "Plastic
>> bad", I love it.  This is real progress toward getting all the common list
>> argument idioms aired out.  All we need now is a homage to Mike Godwin and
>> we can close this down.
> It's not so much a car analogy as a plastic bad analogy.

Don't be such an analogy Nazi.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-10 15:50:40
Subject: Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...
Previous:From: felixDate: 2011-02-09 22:54:29
Subject: Re: Really really slow select count(*)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Itagaki TakahiroDate: 2011-02-10 02:00:27
Subject: Re: another mvcc.sgml typo
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-02-10 00:30:54
Subject: another mvcc.sgml typo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group