Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Gorshkov <gorshkovlists(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-10 01:58:12
Message-ID: 4D534634.7090902@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On 2011-02-03 22:48, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg Smith<greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes they're useful, but like a plastic bad covering a broken car window,
>>> they're useful because they cover something that's inherently broken.
>>>
>>
>> Awesome. Now we have a car anology, with a funny typo no less. "Plastic
>> bad", I love it. This is real progress toward getting all the common list
>> argument idioms aired out. All we need now is a homage to Mike Godwin and
>> we can close this down.
>
> It's not so much a car analogy as a plastic bad analogy.
>

Don't be such an analogy Nazi.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-02-10 02:00:27 Re: another mvcc.sgml typo
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-10 00:30:54 another mvcc.sgml typo

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-10 15:50:40 Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message felix 2011-02-09 22:54:29 Re: Really really slow select count(*)