| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Marti Raudsepp" <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "felix" <crucialfelix(at)gmail(dot)com>,<sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Maciek Sakrejda" <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Really really slow select count(*) |
| Date: | 2011-02-08 21:20:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4D515F37020000250003A65D@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate"
>> behavior is what many users seem to want.
> Seems that a better solution would be implementing a new -m option
> that does this transparently?
Maybe. Another option might be to use -t or some new switch (or -t
in combination with some new switch) as a time limit before
escalating to the next shutdown mode.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-02-08 21:41:00 | Re: Really really slow select count(*) |
| Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-02-08 21:09:46 | Re: Really really slow select count(*) |