Re: SSI patch version 14

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,<markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14
Date: 2011-02-08 19:24:05
Message-ID: 4D5143F5020000250003A655@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Taking RWConflictPool into account in PredicateLockShmemSize() fixes
the
> underestimate, but makes the overestimate correspondingly larger.
I've
> never compared the actual and estimated shmem sizes of other parts of

> the backend, so I'm not sure how large discrepancies we usually have,

> but that seems quite big.

Looking into it...

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-08 19:25:38 Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-02-08 19:18:42 Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2