Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-03 21:50:20
Message-ID: 4D4B231C.3030802@vmsinfo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Chris Browne wrote:
> Well, the community declines to add hints until there is actual
> consensus on a good way to add hints.
>
OK. That's another matter entirely. Who should make that decision? Is
there a committee or a person who would be capable of making that decision?

> Nobody has ever proposed a way to add hints where consensus was arrived
> at that the way was good, so...
>

So, I will have to go back on my decision to use Postgres and
re-consider MySQL? I will rather throw away the effort invested in
studying Postgres than to risk an unfixable application downtime. I am
not sure about the world domination thing, though. Optimizer hints are a
big feature that everybody else has and Postgres does not have because
of religious reasons.

--

Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2011-02-03 21:51:24 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2011-02-03 21:34:19 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2011-02-03 21:51:24 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2011-02-03 21:34:19 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...