| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
| Date: | 2011-01-24 09:38:57 |
| Message-ID: | 4D3D48B1.5050707@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 24/01/2011 09:43, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure I agree there. This is a huge list of files to be fixed to
>> have... nothing more. I'm also all for incremental commits as long as
>> they do something.
>
> Where "nothing more" == "wxWidgets 2.9 compatibility"?
>
That's not what I understood from Peter's email because his patch
doesn't take care of OGL, which means we would have a somewhat broken
pgAdmin (no GQB, no graphical EXPLAIN).
> That seems like a WIN to me.
>
Complete 2.9 compatibility would be a win. And I confess I fail to see
why we should commit this patch. What is the added value for this patch?
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-24 09:49:47 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-24 08:43:06 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |