Re: plpython versus gcc 4.5.x

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpython versus gcc 4.5.x
Date: 2011-01-22 22:16:23
Message-ID: 4D3B5737.4050603@wulczer.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22/01/11 19:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Buildfarm members bobcat (Fedora 14 x86) and frogmouth (mingw) have
> been showing an assertion failure in the plpython regression tests
> since this patch went in:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=740e54c

> Given these facts, and the fact that the above-mentioned patch has no
> purpose other than code beautification, I recommend reverting the patch.

Yep, that (sadly) seems to be the best way to proceed. I'll merge master
into the rest of my branches and mop up the resulting conflicts (which
shouldn't be that bad).

Cheers,
Jan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-22 23:06:20 Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2011-01-22 22:10:56 Re: pl/python refactoring