Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marko Tiikkaja" <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>,"Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Date: 2011-01-20 20:57:15
Message-ID: 4D384D4B0200002500039904@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think filtered is pretty clear and like it...

I find it ambiguous. [Takes sip of filtered water.] How about
excluded?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-01-20 21:05:15 Orphaned statements issue
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-20 20:53:43 Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered