Re: replication and pg_hba.conf

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication and pg_hba.conf
Date: 2011-01-16 20:55:20
Message-ID: 4D335B38.5040108@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
> to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
> attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
> includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "principle
> of least surprise" path..

+1. It'll eliminate an entire file to edit for replication setup, so
does a lot to make initial replication setup easier.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-16 20:56:01 Re: pg_stat_replication security
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-01-16 20:53:47 Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name