Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable
Date: 2011-01-12 18:27:00
Message-ID: 4D2DF274.6040301@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin,

I think you overestimate what we can meaninfully put in a tiny
radio-button survey.

I'm only trying to get a straw poll idea of whether we have lots of
people using SERIALIZABLE mode *at all*, or (as I suspect) almost none.
If we get < 5% or respondees saying "we use it in production" then I
think we can assume that backwards compatibility isn't worth discussing.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-01-12 18:52:42 Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-01-12 18:12:48 Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)