From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |
Date: | 2010-12-22 22:07:13 |
Message-ID: | 4D127691.9040503@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 23/12/10 10:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Regarding the contention which Tom expects: the extra load on the CLOG
>> would be 100% reads, no? If it's *all* reads, why would we have any
>> more contention than we have now?
> Read involves sharelock which still causes contention. Those bufmgr
> contention storms we saw before were completely independent of whether
> the pages were accessed for read or for write.
>
> Another thing to keep in mind is that the current clog access code is
> designed on the assumption that there's considerable locality of access
> to pg_clog, ie, you usually only need to consult it for recent XIDs
> because older ones have been hinted. Turn off hint bits, that behavior
> goes out the window.
Would a larger (or configurable) clog cache help with this tho?
Cheers
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-22 23:00:51 | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-12-22 22:05:55 | Re: How much do the hint bits help? |