| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-12-22 18:40:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4D124635.4090706@cs.helsinki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> .. and a wild patch appears.
>>
>> This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
>> CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges
>> and
>> needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.
>
> Is this the patch of record? There are no changes to the documentation
> included.
I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched
it in a very long time. I will work on the documentation if there's a
chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1. This arrangement makes
more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-12-22 18:44:12 | Re: "writable CTEs" |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-12-22 18:28:29 | "writable CTEs" |