From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] queriing the version of libpq |
Date: | 2010-12-16 16:22:53 |
Message-ID: | 4D0A3CDD.4070302@esilo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>
> And it *could* be used in exactly the case you're outlining as long as
> you load the function dynamically.
Detecting the presence of a function does not require a version number.
If the symbol is in the library, use it.
The only reason the version number would come into play is if you were
attempting to detect behavior differences.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2010-12-16 16:27:01 | Re: How to restore from backup to 8.4.3 server using 9.0 dump/restore |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-16 16:13:37 | Re: [GENERAL] queriing the version of libpq |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-16 16:24:11 | Re: default localtimestamp at time zone |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-16 16:19:30 | Re: Extensions, patch v18 (merge against master, bitrot-only-fixes) |