Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql
Date: 2010-12-16 12:40:31
Message-ID: 4D0A08BF.7030007@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> That we're in the position of having prevN_wd for N = 1..5 as the
> current code exists is a sign that we need to refactor the whole
> thing, as you've suggested before.
>
> I'll work up a design and prototype for this by this weekend.
>

Great. I don't think issues around tab completion are enough to block
the next alpha though, and it sounds like the next stage of this needs
to gel a bit more before it will be ready to commit anyway. I'm going
to mark the remaining bits here as returned for now, and trust that
you'll continue chugging away on this so we can get it into the next CF
early.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-16 12:49:31 Extensions, patch v18 (merge against master, bitrot-only-fixes)
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-12-16 12:32:46 Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation