Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
Date: 2010-12-16 01:25:50
Message-ID: 4D096A9E.7050204@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.
>
> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working
> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter
> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?

Exactly. If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajesh Sundar 2010-12-16 06:03:22 pgAgent JobScheduler not running jobs
Previous Message Ng, Stan 2010-12-16 00:07:57 Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes