Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Date: 2010-12-10 20:24:44
Message-ID: 4D028C8C.5020507@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/10/10 12:17 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Or do we want contrib's specific version numbers that are not all the
> same as the current PostgreSQL version number?

I think that each contrib needs its own version numbers. The reason
being that most minor updates don't touch contrib.

Also, once extensions and pgxn are operating full swing, I see contrib
going away anyway ...

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-10 20:26:41 Re: create tablespace fails silently, or succeeds improperly
Previous Message Daniel Loureiro 2010-12-10 20:21:33 Re: Anyone for SSDs?