Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date: 2010-12-08 00:03:49
Message-ID: 4CFECB65.8040601@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Right, which is also an accurate description of its behavior on OS X,
> as well as Linux (if you didn't change hdparm settings). So the real
> question here is what's the point of treating Windows differently.

So, sounds like we should continue treating fsync_writethrough the same
as we have been, and maybe add a doc patch covering some of the above?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-08 00:13:34 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Previous Message Chris Browne 2010-12-08 00:00:47 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes