Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2010-12-07 12:51:47
Message-ID: 4CFE2DE3.9020406@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/07/2010 09:23 AM, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
> This is what Postgres-XC is doing between a coordinator and a
> datanode. Coordinator may correspond to poolers/loadbalancers.
> Does anyone think it makes sense to extract XC implementation of
> snapshot shipping to PostgreSQL itself?

well if there is a preeceeding implementation of that it would certainly
be of interest to see that - but before you go and extract the code
maybe you could tell us how exactly it works?

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-12-07 13:50:38 Re: serializable read only deferrable
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-07 11:07:14 Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child