Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Date: 2010-11-18 19:31:47
Message-ID: 4CE57F23.8040108@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/18/2010 02:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> -only a few people use FOR IN SELECT UNNEST for iteration over array.

How on earth do you know that? I use it a lot and I was just
demonstrating it to a client yesterday, and I'm quite sure he will use
it a lot too. I bet I'm far from alone.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-11-18 19:32:00 Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-11-18 19:28:55 Re: Indent authentication overloading