Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development!

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
Cc: PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development!
Date: 2010-11-18 17:41:21
Message-ID: 4CE56541.8000105@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> Does that sum it up adequately?

One more thing: that you might not get all of these options in 9.1.
Currently the discussion is talking about *maybe* offering checkpointing
of unlogged tables, which would allow such tables to survive a normal
restart, and including unlogged tables in pg_dump by default. But it's
also possible that we'll only have one type of unlogged table in 9.1.,
with other options waiting for 9.2.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Allan Kamau 2010-11-18 18:23:36 Re: ERROR row is too big size 9336, exceeds size 8160 when populating record with tsquery and tsvector fields
Previous Message John R Pierce 2010-11-18 17:30:58 Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum