Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, david(at)kineticode(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests
Date: 2010-11-10 22:15:16
Message-ID: 4CDB1974.5030407@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/10/2010 05:06 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Marti Raudsepp<marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like you could use pgTAP with dblink to do the same? :)
>
> I had never read through the docs for dblink until you posted this.
> In fact, it appears that some testing of proper SSI behavior can be
> added to standard regression tests with dblink (without needing
> pgTAP) if there is some way to allow a contrib module like that to
> be used. Would I have to add the SSI tests to the dblink regression
> tests, or is there some more graceful way that might be made to
> work?
>
> I don't think this would be a sane way to *replace* the dcheck
> tests, but it might be a way to work *some* testing of SSI into a
> more frequently run test set.

We already use some contrib stuff in the regression tests. (It really is
time we stopped calling it contrib.)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 22:26:17 Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-10 22:06:10 Re: multi-platform, multi-locale regression tests