Re: JDBC Transactions

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt(at)abpni(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC Transactions
Date: 2010-11-02 23:11:57
Message-ID: 4CD09ABD.1050705@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 02/11/10 18:29, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:

> I don't really mind what happens, as
> long as the user is made aware of what has happen, and there aren’t any
> memberships with no corresponding customers.

Well, that's taken care of by a referential integrity constraint. You
don't need anything else.

It sounded earlier like you also needed to ensure that there were no
customers without corresponding memberships.

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-11-02 23:16:21 Re: Replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-02 23:09:00 Re: Postgres connection errors