| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE new syntax for enum |
| Date: | 2010-10-31 16:44:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4CCD9CDE.2080403@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 31/10/2010 00:39, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 30/10/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>>> Yeah, that's really nasty. I guess we need split the commands at ;.
>>
>> Yeah. If it's not between quotes. I don't like it at all, but I don't
>> see another way of doing it.
>>
>>> I guess we should pass a flag down somehow to tell the function that
>>> executes the query to do that and then we could also potentially get
>>> rid of the double SQL boxes. I'm not looking at the code, but I
>>> suspect that'll be nasty.
>>>
>>
>> We actually aren't required to add such a flag. We can check if the
>> query contains "ALTER TYPE", and "ADD AFTER" or "ADD BEFORE".
>
> That's knowledge I'd rather avoid hardwiring into the lower level
> machinery here.
>
So do I. I tried a few things yesterday. Changing the apply() and
GetSql() parameters imply to change all GetSql for all dlg* source code.
That will be quite an invasive patch.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2010-11-01 15:55:55 | [pgAdmin III] #274: Restore database form button |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-10-31 07:39:17 | Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE new syntax for enum |