From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Rob Wultsch" <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ben Chobot" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Date: | 2010-10-22 20:15:30 |
Message-ID: | 4CC1AA920200002500036D0F@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-www |
Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> not needing full_page_writes would make geographically dispersed
> replication possible for certain cases where it is not currently
> (or at least rather painful).
Do you have any hard numbers on WAL file size impact? How much does
pglesslog help in a file-based WAL transmission environment? Should
we be considering similar filtering for streaming replication?
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-10-23 04:07:49 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-10-22 20:06:11 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2010-10-22 20:52:38 | Pugs site |
Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-10-22 20:06:11 | Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles |