Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Rob Wultsch" <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ben Chobot" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles
Date: 2010-10-22 20:15:30
Message-ID: 4CC1AA920200002500036D0F@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance pgsql-www

Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> not needing full_page_writes would make geographically dispersed
> replication possible for certain cases where it is not currently
> (or at least rather painful).

Do you have any hard numbers on WAL file size impact? How much does
pglesslog help in a file-based WAL transmission environment? Should
we be considering similar filtering for streaming replication?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Wultsch 2010-10-23 04:07:49 Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles
Previous Message Rob Wultsch 2010-10-22 20:06:11 Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Ellsworth 2010-10-22 20:52:38 Pugs site
Previous Message Rob Wultsch 2010-10-22 20:06:11 Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles