Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions

From:	"Reuven M(dot) Lerner" <reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions
Date:	2010-10-13 19:34:54
Message-ID:	4CB609DE.2000405@lerner.co.il
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2010-10-13 07:30:45 from "Reuven M(dot) Lerner" <reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il>  2010-10-13 08:11:48 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>  2010-10-13 13:50:33 from Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>  2010-10-13 14:14:26 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2010-10-13 19:34:54 from "Reuven M(dot) Lerner" <reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il>   2010-10-14 14:28:50 from Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>    2010-10-14 14:40:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-performance

In response to

• Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions at 2010-10-13 14:14:26 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Mladen Gogala	2010-10-13 19:35:02	Re: Bogus startup cost for WindowAgg
Previous Message	Alex Hunsaker	2010-10-13 19:09:22	Re: Slow count(*) again...