Re: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL
Date: 2010-10-11 17:50:08
Message-ID: 4CB34E50.3080201@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> There's a number of blog tests floating around comparing XFS and Ext3,
> and the various Linux schedulers, for PGDATA or for an all-in-one mount.
>
> However, the WAL has a rather particular write pattern, and it's
> reasonable to assume that it shouldn't be optimized the same way as
> PGDATA. Has anyone done any head-to-heads for WAL drive configuration
> changes?

That would be a "no", then. Looks like I have my work cut out for me ...

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-10-11 18:06:23 Re: XFS vs Ext3, and schedulers, for WAL
Previous Message Craig James 2010-10-11 17:46:17 Re: Slow count(*) again...