Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes
Date: 2010-10-08 16:27:46
Message-ID: 4CAF4682.1080808@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> IMO, what's needed is to fix GIN so it doesn't go insane for empty
> values or non-restrictive queries, by ensuring there's at least one
> index entry for every row. This has been discussed before; see the TODO
> section for GIN.

Well, what is that fix waiting on, then? Oleg, Teodor? We may even
have a modest budget for a patch, so if funding would help, I'll ask.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-08 16:29:59 Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-08 16:23:48 Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability