| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Slony-I 2.0.5 Released |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 17:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAE0070.2060506@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general |
Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> What are the pros/cons of using Slony vs the nre streaming replication in v9?
>
There was a good discussion of this recently on the list; the three most
relevant comments were:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-09/msg00605.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87hbhkcrm1.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C979AEF.9030402@ca.afilias.info
P.S. As you just discovered, replying to a message sent to
pgsql-announce doesn't usually work. That one is intended only for
announcements, not the sort of chatter that happens here on pgsql-general.
--
Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance" Pre-ordering at:
https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Saunders | 2010-10-07 21:18:23 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Slony-I 2.0.5 Released |
| Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2010-10-07 17:05:10 | Re: Slony-I 2.0.5 Released |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Neyman | 2010-10-07 17:59:25 | Re: 8.1 Table partition and getting error |
| Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2010-10-07 17:05:10 | Re: Slony-I 2.0.5 Released |