Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
Date: 2010-10-01 16:48:25
Message-ID: 4CA610D9.6070506@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01.10.2010 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I've noticed that "git push" will reject an attempt to push an
> update in one branch if my other branches are not up to date, even
> if I am not trying to push anything for those branches. That's
> pretty annoying too; is there a way around that?

Yeah, that's annoying. You can do "git push origin <branch>", and it
will only try to push that branch, ignoring the others.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-01 16:49:54 Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-10-01 16:29:55 Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?