Re: Standby registration

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standby registration
Date: 2010-09-30 14:32:26
Message-ID: 4CA49F7A.4030109@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29.09.2010 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Aside from standby registration itself, I have another thought for C). Keeping
> many WAL files in pg_xlog of the master is not good design in the first place.
> I cannot believe that pg_xlog in most systems has enough capacity to store many
> WAL files for the standby.
>
> Usually the place where many WAL files can be stored is the archive. So I've
> been thinking to make walsender send the archived WAL file to the standby.
> That is, when the WAL file required for the standby is not found in pg_xlog,
> walsender restores it from the archive by executing restore_command that users
> specified. Then walsender read the WAL file and send it.
>
> Currently, if pg_xlog is not enough large in your system, you have to struggle
> with the setup of warm-standby environment on streaming replication, to prevent
> the WAL files still required for the standby from being deleted before shipping.
> Many people would be disappointed about that fact.
>
> The archived-log-shipping approach cuts out the need of setup of warm-standby
> and wal_keep_segments. So that would make streaming replication easier to use.
> Thought?

The standby can already use restore_command to fetch WAL files from the
archive. I don't see why the master should be involved in that.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2010-09-30 14:39:23 Re: Using streaming replication as log archiving
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-09-30 14:27:51 Re: is sync rep stalled?