| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>,<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>,<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
| Date: | 2010-09-25 15:34:56 |
| Message-ID: | 4C9DD0500200002500035DAE@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nicolas Barbier wrote:
> IOW, one could say that the backup is consistent only if it were
> never compared against the system as it continued running after the
> dump took place.
Precisely. I considered making that point in the email I just sent,
but figured I had rambled enough. I suppose I should have gone
there; thanks for covering the omission. :-)
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Esteban Zimanyi | 2010-09-25 15:56:29 | Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++ |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-25 15:24:27 | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |