From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: gitignore |
Date: | 2010-09-24 08:34:15 |
Message-ID: | 4C9C6287.9090306@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 24/09/2010 10:23, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my
>> colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now,
>> when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, configure it and make it, "git
>> status" shows a lot of uninteresting files. A .gitignore file would help
>> to notice changed files. I've come with the file attached, but would
>> like to get comments on this.
>
> Haven't looked at the contents of the file, but definitely +1 on the
> concept in genereal (probably not surprising, since I did the same
> thing for the postgresql repo :P)
>
Yeah, I took a look at the mail where you show all the changes done, and
I worked from this. I have one question about it. There is many
.gitignore files. Why not a single one? what are the advantages of the
multi-file way?
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-09-24 08:35:56 | Re: gitignore |
Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2010-09-24 08:32:03 | Re: gitignore |