| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 17:12:31 |
| Message-ID: | 4C9A38FF.6000600@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 22/09/10 20:02, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/09/10 20:00, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that
>> rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people
>> probably want to eventually have.
>
> FWIW it could be a system catalog backed by a flat file. But I'm not in
> favor of that for the other reasons I stated earlier.
Huh, I just realized that my reply didn't make any sense. For some
reason I thought you were saying that it can't be a catalog because
backends need to access it without attaching to a database.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-22 17:16:51 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-09-22 17:09:18 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-22 17:16:51 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-22 17:09:23 | Re: Documentation, window functions |