| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git conversion status |
| Date: | 2010-09-20 18:40:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4C97AAA9.7050908@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/20/2010 08:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> On 09/20/2010 08:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Well, I'm testing with an unmodified copy of 1.12.13, and I got output
>>> matching our historical tarballs. So I'm blaming debian for this one.
>
>> As far as I know magnus is using a debian based CVS server for his
>> testing so that would certainly be 1.12.x - are you too?
>
> No server anywhere: I'm reading from a local repository which is a
> tarball copy of the one on cvs.postgresql.org. 1.12.13 is the only
> version in question. (I believe Magnus is not using a server either;
> the cvs2git documentation says that it will only work from a local repo,
> and even if that's not true I shudder to think how long it would take
> over a network.)
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-07/msg00106.html
is what I'm refering too and what the debian people provided a patch to
work around for(starting with1:1.12.9-17 in 2005) - nut sure why you are
not seeing it...
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-09-20 18:47:57 | Re: Git conversion status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-20 18:33:55 | Re: Git conversion status |