| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
| Date: | 2010-09-16 23:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4C925D6902000025000358F6@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually
> confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk
> of our headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including
> relcache.h in another header is not much of a problem.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
With the structures all brought back together in a logical order,
and the new comments in front of the structure declarations, do you
think a summary at the top of the file is still needed in that
header file?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-16 23:14:19 | Re: Progress indication prototype |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-16 22:58:06 | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |