Re: BUG #5629: ALTER SEQUENCE foo START execute a RESTART

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alexsander Rosa <alexsander(dot)rosa(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5629: ALTER SEQUENCE foo START execute a RESTART
Date: 2010-09-01 14:18:10
Message-ID: 4C7E60A2.9060706@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane escreveu:
> I'm not inclined to go and retroactively document that these spellings
> are possible but deprecated in the old branches. I think that would
> just confuse matters even more.
>
Is it worth preventing that sloppy implementation in the old branches?

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2010-09-01 14:22:49 Re: issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-01 01:14:12 Re: [BUGS] Estimation of Plan quality