Re: SQLSTATE of notice PGresult

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQLSTATE of notice PGresult
Date: 2010-08-25 15:01:03
Message-ID: 4C75302F.1000302@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escreveu:
> You didn't actually read what I said, did you? That patch will have
> precisely zero effect on the OP's example.
>
Oh, I see your point. Didn't pay attention at the OP's example. I was only
worried about the successful queries that doesn't return SQLSTATE but as you
point out, that part of the code deserves a refactoring to cover OP's case too.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2010-08-25 15:05:57 Re: HS/SR on AIX
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-25 14:57:28 Re: Deadlock bug