| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104 |
| Date: | 2010-08-25 07:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4C74CB2E.9060805@cs.helsinki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-08-25 9:26 AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Whats the plan to go forward at that subject? I think the patch needs
>> to lock tables exclusively (the pg level, not access exclusive) as
>> long as there is no additional handling...
>
> Well, you can always do LOCK TABLE before calling MERGE if that's what
> you want, but I don't think doing that automatically would make people
> happy.
I don't think having a MERGE that throws UNIQUE violations would make
people happy either.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-08-25 07:58:25 | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-08-25 07:29:23 | Re: WIP: extensible enums |