| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Matrix |
| Date: | 2010-08-11 17:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | 4C62DA5C.7030107@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 08/11/2010 02:29 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> The matrix is also beginning to look a bit busy too. Once support for
>> 7.4 and 8.0 stops, do you think we should also drop those columns? If
>> so, we could also drop rows where a feature exists from 8.1 or before
>> which would trim the list.
>
> I think it would be nice to save the existing content to somewhere
> before doing that trimming through. Having a chart showing the major
> feature evolution of the database that goes back as far as possible is
> really useful sometimes. Perhaps forking the current chart into a "7.4
> through 9.0" history, and then trimming everything from before 8.1
> before adding a 9.1 column?
well there are some plans on making the matrix more dynamic with the new
website - but for now I think just hiding the 7.4 and maybe 8.0 columns
will do.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-08-11 17:27:14 | Re: Feature Matrix |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-11 08:15:55 | Re: Feature Matrix |