Re: MySQL versus Postgres

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MySQL versus Postgres
Date: 2010-08-11 15:28:04
Message-ID: 4C62C184.9000805@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Daniel Verite wrote:
> On the other hand, some of the notes already mentioned on the wiki, such as
> for example:
> http://www.xach.com/aolserver/mysql-to-postgresql.html
> ...are so outdated and/or bad that they're probably counter-productive.
> ...
> IMHO such contents should simply be scraped/unlinked.
>

I would happily start removing the obviously outdated content from the
wiki if something better came along. It's hard to blow away stuff just
because it could be better right now, when that would leave that section
near empty at the end.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 3dmashup 2010-08-11 15:28:07 Re: C++ User-defined functions
Previous Message Jens Wilke 2010-08-11 15:15:09 Re: Second request: Problem with dumps