Re: MERGE command for inheritance

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Date: 2010-08-11 12:53:12
Message-ID: 4C629D38.7040609@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/08/10 14:44, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> I concur that Boxuan's suggested "difficult" approach seems like the
>> right one.
>
> Right, but you've completely ignored my proposal: lets do this in two
> pieces. Get what we have now ready to commit, then add support for
> partitioning later, as a second project.

It seems like a pretty serious omission. What would you do, thrown a
"MERGE to inherited tables not implemented" error?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-08-11 12:57:44 Re: "micro bucket sort" ...
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-08-11 12:51:44 Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege