Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report
Date: 2010-08-06 14:31:13
Message-ID: 4C5BD66102000025000342B8@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> With only ten days to go, in order to leave time for committers to
> do their thing, we need to be wrapping up the remaining patches.
> I think we look pretty good. Of the remaining six patches, two
> are Work in Progress, so are not expected to go to a committer;
> three involve a committer, so I figure they can decide when and if
> it's time to return or move them, which just leaves one which is
> down to tweaking docs.

How embarrassing -- I miscounted. It appears I counted Peter's WiP
patch in two categories and missed counting the "unlimited
parameters for xslt_process" in the above paragraph. (An omission
which jumped out at me when reading this morning's posts.) Mike
Fowler's latest post says "neither the existing code or the patched
code appear able to evaluate the parameters." Is it time to mark
this "Returned with Feedback" and hope for a new patch in the next
CF?

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcelo Mas 2010-08-06 14:39:28 BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-08-06 14:31:03 Re: postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-06 19:55:05 Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Previous Message Mike Fowler 2010-08-06 08:04:15 Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function