Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user

On 8/5/10 6:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> pg_stat_user_functions has an inconsistent notion of what "user" is.
> Whereas the other pg_stat_user_* views filter out non-user objects by
> schema, pg_stat_user_functions checks for language "internal", which
> does not successfully exclude builtin functions of language SQL. Is
> there a reason for this inconsistency?

Undoubtedly because function data collection already filters on function
language, per the GUC setting. Not that that is a *good* reason, but I
can see how we arrived a the current functionality.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com