| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Date: | 2010-08-04 19:44:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4C59C320.3050800@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> Well, it'd take an initdb to get rid of it. In the past we've avoided
> forcing initdb post-beta1 unless it was Really Necessary. OTOH, we seem
> to be in the mode of encouraging beta testers to test pg_upgrade, so
> maybe that concern isn't worth much at the moment.
If it's causing bugs, drop it now. If we include it in 9.0, we're stuck
with it for years.
I'm OK with forcing an initDB for RC1.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-04 19:46:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-04 19:42:42 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-04 19:46:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-04 19:42:42 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |