| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Beta4 release announcement |
| Date: | 2010-08-02 20:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4C572C75.7080502@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 8/2/10 1:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't even understand why we bothered to send a
> correction. It's all fine and good to say that moderators on
> -announce should exercise caution, but what are they supposed to be
> cautious ABOUT? A minor wording problem with a release announcement
> that requires a microscope to detect?
The issue was that it went out when Beta4 wasn't yet available and the
home page wasn't updated. Otherwise it would have been fine, and there
would have been no 2nd announcement.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-08-02 20:58:35 | Re: 9442-92C3-C7E6 : CONSULT from pgsql-announce (post) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-02 20:36:48 | Re: Beta4 release announcement |