Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3

From: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Date: 2010-07-28 11:22:29
Message-ID: 4C5012F5.8090005@siriusit.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> No, the configure test is wrong. Here's what's in configure.ac:
>
>
> dnl Temporary hack until minimum PostgreSQL version is 8.5:
> dnl If PostgreSQL < 8.5 is detected, trigger the inclusion of the
> new versioned PGXS targets
> PGXSOVERRIDE=0
> if test ! "$PGSQL_MINOR_VERSION" -ge 5; then
> PGXSOVERRIDE=1
> fi
>
>
> Of course, we don't have any such thing as 8.5.

Ah wait - I see. The fix is in already in the 1.5 branch, it just hasn't
hit a release yet :(

http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/5421/branches/1.5/configure.ac

Looks like we need to push a new release in time for 9.0...

ATB,

Mark.

--
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
PostgreSQL - PostGIS
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063

Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-07-28 11:24:56 Re: Query optimization problem
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-28 11:13:44 Re: Query optimization problem