Re: Locking Down a Database

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)chosen-ones(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Locking Down a Database
Date: 2010-07-15 14:42:18
Message-ID: 4C3F1E4A.30603@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Le 15/07/2010 16:21, Shoaib Mir a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Terry Lee Tucker
> <terry(at)chosen-ones(dot)org <mailto:terry(at)chosen-ones(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>
> I occasionally find the need to perform some maintenance on one or
> more of
> thirteen different databases. Typically, due to the interaction
> between the
> databases, I need to lock down the databases for a short period of
> time so
> that no updates are being performed anywhere.
>
>
> There is something that I saw the other day in PG 9.0 i.e.
> transaction_read_only which might be helpful in your case.

transaction_read_only is not something you can set. It's set by the
server, to "on" on a hotstandby server, and else to "off". And
default_transaction_read_only can be "unset", so not that useful too.

--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthony Presley 2010-07-15 16:16:45 Re: Idle In Transaction
Previous Message Artur Dabrowski 2010-07-15 14:28:56 Re: Incorrect FTS results with GIN index