Re: cpu bound postgresql setup.

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com>, "postgres performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cpu bound postgresql setup.
Date: 2010-06-23 17:43:15
Message-ID: 4C220163020000250003291B@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Your response somehow landed in the subject line, apparently
truncated. I'll extract that to the message body and reply to what
made it through.

Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Firstly many thanks for responding. I am concerned because the
> load averages have increased and users complaining of slowness.

If performance has gotten worse, then something has changed. It
would be helpful to know what. More users? New software? Database
growth? Database bloat? (etc.)

> I do not change settings frequenly.

That doesn't mean your current settings can't be changed to make
things better.

> I was curious if there is any half dead component in th

Have you reviewed what shows up if you run (as a database
superuser)?:

select * from pg_stat_activity;

You might want to review this page:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-23 17:58:01 Re: Aggressive autovacuuming ?
Previous Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2010-06-23 17:30:01 Re: cpu bound postgresql setup. Firstly many thanks for responding. I am concerned because the load averages have increased and users complaining of slowness. I do not change settings frequenly. I was curious if there is any half dead component in th