Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Date: 2010-06-17 19:59:39
Message-ID: 4C1A7EAB.3020202@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely
> c) Turn off the background writer

Note that if you turn off full_page_writes and set
bgwriter_lru_maxpages=0, you'd get a substantial move in both these
directions without touching any code. Would help prove those as useful
directions to move toward or not. The difference in WAL writes just
after a checkpoint in particular, due to the full_page_writes behavior,
is a significant portion of total WAL activity on most systems.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre C 2010-06-17 20:12:25 Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-17 19:38:30 Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache