Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Date: 2010-06-15 19:57:06
Message-ID: 4C17DB12.9030905@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I wonder if it would be possible to jigger things so that we send the
> WAL to the standby as soon as it is generated, but somehow arrange
> things so that the standby knows the last location that the master has
> fsync'd and never applies beyond that point.

I can't think of any way which would not require major engineering. And
you'd be slowing down replication *in general* to deal with a fairly
unlikely corner case.

I think the panic is the way to go.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-15 20:06:52 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-15 18:44:32 Re: [PERFORM] No hash join across partitioned tables?